Here is a sample that showcases why we are one of the world’s leading academic writing firms. This assignment was created by one of our expert academic writers and demonstrated the highest academic quality. Place your order today to achieve academic greatness.
This review is based on the interview done by Professor Swift regarding parental partiality. Normally, parents fulfill every requirement of their children with no discrimination.
The comparison of rich and poor families shows the difference of parental partiality in their behavior. There are certain limits in the expression of parental partiality.
When parents are allowed to do anything for their children, then the factor of unfairness may arise as professor swift has done a lot of researchers in this area and on the ethics of school. The private school should be abolished in principles from the society because it is one reason for generating unfairness for other children (Bou‐Habib, 2014).
A theory has been presented which distinguishes bedtime stories from elite schools. The bedtime stories are the major and most significant interaction among parents and children.
This interaction puts a good impact on the personality development of children. Other engagements are also needed by children, including chatting daily, hanging out, listening to their problems, etc.
The parents also look forward to such a kind of intimate relationship with their children and feel its absence if the interaction is not maintained. This argument is not particularly about homosexual parents, single parents, adopted parents, etc. are also included.
Parents usually seem to be protecting their child from social inequalities, although some people in the society defend the practices of social inequalities by appealing for them. Parents have an opinion of allowing their children for anything they wish to do no matter it affects social inequality.
In comparison to it, the elite schooling has a total absence of such kind of intimate relationship in their families which has been observed in the personality of those children.
As the freedom is given to parents to fulfill every desire of their children, it should be limited. Their parents should restrict children’s wishes that might harm them.
But usually, the parents get overindulged in the intimate relationship with their child that they never say no to their children for anything which affects them at some point in time.
It shows that familial relationships are significant for a family, but rich families do not bother to sacrifice their time for any interaction with their children. Equal opportunities should be given to elite class and other children at the school level and other activities as far as they desire the right things (Kolodny, 2010).
The parents should maintain their intimate relationship with their children without allowing them to go against social inequalities. Parental rights are not based on the ruling kind of relationship with their children.
Parents enforce or implement their religious or cultural values without thinking of their children’s interests and values (Western and Pettit, 2010). All of these arguments might not consider by society in reality, but in the long run, it can make a difference to think more on this line. More debate can be done on the ideal and non-ideal theories of this issue, but parents should think more about their relationship with children.
Bou‐Habib, P., 2014. The moralized view of parental partiality. Journal of Political Philosophy, 22(1), pp.66-83.
Kolodny, N., 2010. Which relationships justify partiality? The case of parents and children. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 38(1), pp.37-75.
Western, B. and Pettit, B., 2010. Incarceration & social inequality. Daedalus, 139(3), pp.8-19.
To write a master’s assignment:
SERVICES
COMPANY DETAILS
